Trust & Procurement
Trust model for production adoption.
Use this page for governance-level trust signals, transparency links, and review workflow. For technical control details, see the dedicated Security page.
Trust signals at a glance
Deterministic outcomes
The same input and policy state return the same verdict, reducing reviewer concern around answer drift.
Verifiable evidence
Each decision can be tied to a request_id and hash-linked metadata for QA, disputes, and audits.
Visible policy freshness
Daily policy checks and alert history are published so teams can verify maintenance is active, not implied.
Procurement quick answers
| Question | Answer | Where to verify |
|---|---|---|
| How do we verify current security controls? | Security implementation details are centralized on one technical page to avoid stale duplication. | /resources/security |
| How do we know policy monitoring is active? | Daily checks produce a public alert feed and linked evidence artifacts. | /resources/policy-alerts |
| How can legal or compliance review terms? | Pilot terms and readiness artifacts are available as dedicated resources. | /resources/pilot-terms |
| What is the evidence model for a decision? | Decision runs expose request_id-linked traces for replay and export. |
/resources/proof |
| How do we start a formal review? | Share framework and timeline to receive a scoped review packet. | support@decide.fyi |
Need questionnaire support? Include your framework (for example SIG Lite or CAIQ) and target date in your request.
Review workflow
Most teams evaluate decide in this order: product fit in live demo, technical controls on the Security page, then procurement artifacts (pilot terms, proof package, and policy alerts). This keeps trust review fast without duplicating specs across pages.