Trust & Procurement
Trust model for production adoption.
Use this page for governance-level trust signals, transparency links, and review workflow. For technical control details, see the dedicated Security page.
Source links: security controls, status, reference alerts, API access terms.
Trust signals at a glance
Deterministic outcomes
The same input and declared runtime state return the same verdict, reducing reviewer concern around answer drift.
Verifiable evidence
Each decision can be tied to a request_id and hash-linked metadata for QA, disputes, and audits.
Visible source freshness
Reference applications publish daily checks and alert history so teams can verify maintenance is active, not implied.
Procurement packet
A buyer should not have to infer the trust story from scattered pages. These are the source-of-truth artifacts to forward during security, legal, and implementation review.
Security controls
Transport, access, audit traceability, data boundaries, and current certification limits.
02Status + readiness export
Live endpoint status, readiness JSON, monitor scope, and incident communication path.
03API contract
Request shape, response contract, authentication, idempotency, and usage limits.
04Commercial terms
Kickoff scope, production billing, cancellation terms, and support boundaries.
Procurement quick answers
| Question | Answer | Where to verify |
|---|---|---|
| How do we verify current security controls? | Security implementation details are centralized on one technical page to avoid stale duplication. | /resources/security |
| How do we know reference monitoring is active? | Daily checks for source-backed reference applications produce a public alert feed and linked evidence artifacts. | /resources/policy-alerts |
| How can legal or compliance review terms? | API access terms and readiness artifacts are available as dedicated resources. | /resources/pilot-terms |
| What is the evidence model for a decision? | Decision runs expose request_id-linked traces for replay and export. |
/resources/proof |
| How do we start a formal review? | Share framework and timeline to receive a scoped review packet. | [email protected] |
Need questionnaire support? Include your framework (for example SIG Lite or CAIQ) and target date in your request.
Review workflow
Most teams evaluate decide in this order: product fit in the sandbox, runtime visibility on the Status page, technical controls on the Security page, then procurement artifacts (API access terms, proof package, and reference alerts). This keeps trust review fast without duplicating specs across pages.